I’ll show the % difference for individual shots for a couple sets of data (there is too much data for this to be practical for each shot and club). I’ll use the absolute value of % difference on each shot. So for individual shots, I’m going to avoid using “average % error” as that could smooth out the nuance if the Mevo mixes over-reads with under-reads – it would improperly return a value very close to zero. For the latter, if someone hits 10 shots with each club, the individual variation doesn’t matter as much so long as the averages are close to the true (Trackman) averages. I think it’s realistic to break this down to two parts – accuracy for individual shots, and accuracy for club gapping purposes (e.g., if you look at averages for 5-10 shots with each club). I include “2022” in the title because a disgusting amount of data interpretation happens behind the scenes with these companies and their proprietary calculations, and Flightscope’s firmware updates improve accuracy even as the hardware remains the same. Reflective metallic stickers were used on each ball to improve accuracy, per the recommendations of Flightscope. above sea level).ĭata was collected indoors with 8 feet of unobstructed ball flight. Both devices were calibrated for the altitude I usually play at in Akron (1,000 ft.
I spent a couple sessions hitting on one and comparing its read of each shot to the Mevo. Obviously owning one is impractical for most humans, but thankfully they can be rented for $30 an hour where I live. There is a wide variety of launch monitors at various price points, but at the top end for radar models is the Trackman 4 (starting at $18,995), which is the gold standard I used for these tests.
Mcat practice test score progression portable#
The Mevo ($450) is a portable radar launch monitor, which uses Doppler radar to measure different parameters of a golf shot. Overview, methods: Where the magic happened….